How are aerospace and defense businesses valued?

A&D businesses typically trade on EBITDA multiples (8-10x) varying by program positions, technology differentiation, and growth trajectory. Classified programs and strong positions on priority platforms command premiums. Aftermarket businesses often command higher multiples.

What role does CFIUS play in A&D transactions?

Committee on Foreign Investment in US reviews transactions with national security implications. Foreign buyers face significant scrutiny. CFIUS filing requirements and timeline affect deal structuring. Some transactions may be prohibited.

How do security clearances affect A&D valuations?

Facility clearances and personnel clearances represent significant value. Cleared facilities enable classified work. Understanding clearance status and transfer requirements is essential.

What buyer types are active in US A&D M&A?

Strategic primes and Tier 1s pursue capability expansion. Private equity drives middle-market consolidation. US-only restrictions limit some foreign participation. Defense-focused investors are active.

How do program lifecycle positions affect valuations?

Production-phase programs provide stable revenue. Development programs carry execution risk but growth potential. Program end-of-life creates transition risk. Understanding portfolio lifecycle is essential.

What due diligence is emphasized in A&D transactions?

Key areas include: contract review, security clearance status, program positions, ITAR/EAR compliance, customer relationships, and technology assessment. Cost accounting system compliance requires attention.

Industrial & Manufacturing

Aerospace & Defense Business Valuation Calculator – United States

Get an instant estimate of your aerospace & defense enterprise value in USD using industry-specific multiples.

Aerospace & Defense Valuation Multiples

EBITDA Multiple11.5x typical

8.5x11.5x15x

Revenue Multiple2.5x typical

1.5x2.5x3.5x

Based on middle-market transaction data. Actual multiples vary based on company-specific factors.

Key Value Drivers for Aerospace & Defense

01DoD contract backlog and visibility
02Security clearances and ITAR compliance
03Prime contractor relationships
04Technology readiness levels
05Aftermarket and sustainment revenue

Calculate Your Aerospace & Defense Enterprise Value

Complete the form below to get your personalized enterprise value estimate in USD

About Aerospace & Defense Valuations in United States

The United States dominates global aerospace and defense with $900+ billion in combined annual spending, creating the deepest M&A market for A&D companies worldwide. Defense-focused PE firms (Veritas, Arlington, American Industrial Partners) have deployed record capital, while strategic acquirers from L3Harris to Northrop pursue capability consolidation across the supply chain.

What distinguishes US A&D valuations is the intersection of program positions, security infrastructure, and technology differentiation. DoD prime positions on priority platforms (NGAD, B-21, Columbia-class submarines) command 10-12.5x EBITDA premiums. Cleared facilities with Top Secret/SCI programs trade at significant premiums versus commercial-only operations. Defense electronics and software companies routinely see 12.5-15x multiples when selling to strategics seeking digital capabilities.

Valuation frameworks segment sharply by business model: aftermarket parts and services trade at 8-11.5x EBITDA with recurring revenue characteristics; production contracts at 8-15x reflecting program lifecycle risk; and R&D-stage defense tech at revenue multiples when conventional metrics don't apply. Commercial aerospace suppliers remain subject to Boeing/Airbus production rate volatility affecting near-term valuations.

The buyer landscape reflects defense budget priorities: strategic acquirers target capabilities aligned with JADC2, hypersonics, and space. Defense-focused PE has consolidated missile components, avionics, and specialized manufacturing. CFIUS scrutiny increasingly restricts foreign buyers even from allied nations, pushing valuations higher for US-owned platforms.

ITAR/EAR compliance creates due diligence complexity requiring specialized counsel. Facility clearance transitions (DSS-sponsored versus contractor-sponsored) affect deal timelines. Cost accounting system adequacy (CAS-covered contracts) and DCAA audit history are critical diligence areas. SOC 2 and CMMC 2.0 requirements increasingly affect cybersecurity valuations.